"Congcritter Charles Rangel, D-N.Y., said Sunday he sees his idea as a way to deter politicians from launching wars and to bolster U.S. troop levels insufficient to cover potential future action in Iran, North Korea and Iraq. (Yep, worked GREAT for Vietnam!)

"There's no question in my mind that this president and this administration would never have invaded Iraq, especially on the flimsy evidence that was presented to the Congress, if indeed we had a draft and members of Congress and the administration thought that their kids from their communities would be placed in harm's way," Rangel said." (So, NO ONE from Texas is in Iraq? NO ONE from Wyoming serves?) What a frigging idiot.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/19/AR2006111900376_pf.html

   Oh yeah, THIS is gonna work out well.

   First of all, rich politician's kids WILL NEVER SERVE if DRAFTED as they will have deferments. Period. End of story. THAT is how the SYSTEM WORKS. The MIDDLE-CLASS and the POOR, who ALREADY SERVE will be hit hard by scum swept into their ranks.

   If that senile fool from NY had a brain cell functioning, he'd KNOW that the draft is the WRONG THING to enact. Why?

1. The kids today that do not JOIN the military DO NOT WANT TO SERVE their nation. Period. End of frigging story. Mommy and Daddy raised them NOT TO LOVE their country and to let "someone" else serve.

2. Those drafted WILL NOT WORK OUT because of one simple fact. THEY DON'T WANT TO BE THERE! Whattya gonna do Charlie, throw them out for not adjusting to military life? Idiot.

3. The multitude of draftees will be flunked out of boot camp for lack of guts, lack of brains, lack of balls, refusal to train, etc, etc, and the COST of getting rid of them WILL CUT INTO THE MILITARY's BUDGET!

4. Putting a DRAFTEE into a stressful environment that they did not BUY INTO in the first place is ASKING FOR TROUBLE! 90% of the time, they're gonna bug out. This will get OTHER PEOPLE KILLED.

   Rangel shows just how far OUT OF TOUCH with America liberals are today by proposing this complete pile of SH*T! 

   The liberals DO NOT want a competent military otherwise WHY WOULD THEY have slashed the military's budget time and time again thoroughout American history.

1. Pacifist liberal Wilson slashed the military after WW1. He even cut their benefits forcing a vets march on DC!

2. Truman, with an administration full of commie scum, BUTCHERS the military after WW2 and allows the mouth of Dean Acheson to set the stage for the invasion of South Korea. The Marines in the Pusan perimeter saved Korea.

3. LBJ bungles Vietnam after getting 50,000 GI's killed in the process. He also allows his idiot SecDef McNamara to clean out the nation's jails and put them in the service. There is no number on the cost to put these criminals OUT OF THE SERVICE!

4. Carter...HAHA. Yeah. Carter, what a guy. Did WONDERS for the military.

5. Drop-Trou Bubba, SLASHED the military WAY PAST THE BONE to ensure his "peace dividend" could be used to buy votes for libdolts nationwide.

Liberals love the military? In a pig's azz.

 "Once I had an original thought but I can't remember when exactly.



Charlie Rangel pegs the BULLSH*T METER.

Kucinich Calls for Cutting Off Iraq War Funds

"That’s the only way we’re going to end this war."
Nov 15, 2006  http://kucinich.us/

Congressman Kucinich called Wednesday for cutting off funding of the Iraq war, as the surest way out of Iraq. His statements were made in an interview by Democracy Now!'s Amy Goodman. (Just like the Dummycrats did in Vietnam!)

"I want to say that there's one solution here, and it's not to engage in a debate with the President, who has taken us down a path of disaster in Iraq, but it's for Congress to assume the full power that it has under the Constitution to cut off funds. We don't need to keep indulging in this debate about what to do, because as long as we keep temporizing, the situation gets worse in Iraq.

"We have to determine that the time has come to cut off funds. There’s enough money in the pipeline to achieve the orderly withdrawal that Senator McGovern is talking about. But cut off funds, we must. That's the ultimate power of the Congress, the power of the purse. That's how we'll end this war, and that’s the only way we’re going to end this war.

"We need to shift our direction." (Libspeak for SURRENDER!)

"We have to take a whole new approach. We’re spending over $400 billion a year, money that's also needed for healthcare, for education, for job creation, for seniors. We have to take a new look at this. We need to be a strong country, but strength isn't only military. Strength is also the economic strength of the people, their chance to have good neighborhoods. We spend more money than all the countries of the world put together for the military.

"It's time for us to start to shift our vision about who we are as a nation, because if we don't do that -- we’re borrowing money right now to wage the war in Iraq. We’re borrowing money from China. We’re not looking at our trade deficit. We’re not looking at conditions, where people are going bankrupt trying to pay their hospital bills. We need to shift our direction, and the direction has to be away from the continued militarization of the United States society."