About Me

Name: GunnyG©
Email: libsmustdie@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

ANOTHER End Run around the Constitution and the PCA of 1878.

Posted by GunnyG© on Tuesday, December 02, 2008 8:11:38 AM
Before we get into the meat of the essay, let's examine the recent article from the WaPo who seemed to actually take a Constitutional stance on this issue, surprisingly enough!

EXCERPT: "The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials. The long-planned shift in the Defense Department's role in homeland security was recently backed with funding and troop commitments after years of prodding by Congress and outside experts, defense analysts said. There are critics of the change, in the military and among civil liberties groups and libertarians who express concern that the new homeland emphasis threatens to strain the military and possibly undermine the Posse Comitatus Act, a 130-year-old federal law restricting the military's role in domestic law enforcement. But the Bush administration and some in Congress have pushed for a heightened homeland military role since the middle of this decade, saying the greatest domestic threat is terrorists exploiting the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Before the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, dedicating 20,000 troops to domestic response -- a nearly sevenfold increase in five years -- "would have been extraordinary to the point of unbelievable," Paul McHale, assistant defense secretary for homeland defense, said in remarks last month at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. But the realization that civilian authorities may be overwhelmed in a catastrophe prompted "a fundamental change in military culture," he said."
 
Now, here is the problem that the Feds face and it's called the Posse Commitatus Act of 1878. (and they want it GONE!)

SEC. 15. From and after the passage of this act it shall not be lawful to employ any part of the Army of the United States, as a posse comitatus, or otherwise, for the purpose of executing the laws, except in such cases and under such circumstances as such employment of said force may be expressly authorized by the Constitution or by act of Congress; and no money appropriated by this act shall be used to pay any of the expenses incurred in the employment of any troops in violation of this section And any person willfully violating the provisions of this section shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction thereof shall be punished by fine not exceeding ten thousand dollars or imprisonment not exceeding two years or by both such fine and imprisonment.

Then we find in United States Code 10, (U.S.C.10) in Section 375. Restriction on direct participation by military personnel: "The Secretary of Defense shall prescribe such regulations as may be necessary to ensure that any activity (including the provision of any equipment or facility or the assignment or detail of any personnel) under this chapter does not include or permit direct participation by a member of the Army, Navy, Air Force, or Marine Corps in a search, seizure, arrest, or other similar activity unless participation in such activity by such member is otherwise authorized by law."

Then in U.S.C 18, Section 1385: Use of Army and Air Force as Posse Comitatus: "Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

RINO and serial idiot Senator Warner of Virginia wrote in Oct 2001 to SecDef Rumsfeld (which probably made Patrick Henry roll over in his grave), "Our way of life has forever changed. Should this law [Posse Comitatus Act] now be changed to enable our active-duty military to more fully join other domestic assets in this war against terrorism?''

There is a reason WHY our military is prohibited from acting as a domestic police force and the Constitution not withstanding, the drafters of the PCA of 1878 realized that an occupation of the US Citizens by the US Military is synonymous with an occupation of the US by the Redcoats since this was really still fresh in people's minds PLUS we had just gone through a Civil War. Also, the military is not trained for this mission. Indeed, there were military advisors at Reno's WACO and we all know how that ended up. Short of a nuclear attack, US troops should NEVER be deployed in America as a police force and those who say they SHOULD, should have their head's examined by a shrink. Even in the Flu epidemic in 1918, US troops were NOT deployed on US soil! The Posse Commitatus Act of 1878 CLEARLY PROHIBITS the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marines from participating in arrests, searches, seizure of evidence and other police-type activity on U.S. soil. Indeed, the US Coast Guard and National Guard troops, which are under the control of state governors, are excluded from the act. Why? Because the USCG enforces Customs and Revenue acts as well as local jurisdiction in American waters and the NG troops are under State jurisdiction unless Federalized and then, only by Presidential Act.

Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz stated in October 2001, "In certain cases we can do more than anyone else in the country because of the special capabilities that we have,'' he said, when referencing preventing terrorism.

Wolfowitz fails to realize the historical precedents for things like this. For example, in Rome, the legions were forbidden from crossing the Tiber or entering into Rome for obvious reasons. One, the vigiles and the magistrates were the law within the city but the founders of Rome realized the dangers of having armed troops, with a general that they were loyal to, inside the walls! Common sense here folks. When the Roman Senate finally got stuck on stupid, Sulla marched on Rome and the rest is history, Rome became a dictatorship not a Republic. The same thing occured in Nazi Germany with the Brownshirts out and about in 1933, "keeping the peace." It must always be remembered that absolute power corrupts absolutely. It ALWAYS does. Don't be fooled by the, "it's only for awhile" or "it's for your own good." BULLSH*T! Anything short of a widespread nuclear attack should be handled by local authorities and the state militia, or which all males 18-55 (or so) are a part of, whether you like it or not. THAT is what the Second Amendment is all about. Remember the Wild West and posse's who were deputized by the sheriff, US Marshall, or a judge and then chased the criminals, patrolled their neighborhoods, etc? That is how we handle this, not deploying the military, and really, this should be viewed as a threat by US citizens.

Dennis Corrigan (Col US Army Ret), who taught the law at the Army's Judge Advocate General's school, stated: "I'm not sure, even with what's going on today, that Congress wants the military arresting people.'' (Sorry Dennis, but that is EXACTLY what they want, especially under the arrogant President-elect.)
 
Do we really want to start down this road? Obama has already stated that he wants his "blueshirts" out in force, on a national level, every bit as strong as the US military and as well funded! Does that mean that his "blueshirts" will have Predators to monitor Americans? Will we soon become Britain junior, that has CCTV cameras everywhere and with directional microphones as well, so that the police can listen to a conservation, all in the name of law and order? Of preventing terrorism? Where people are photgraphed over FOUR HUNDRED TIMES A DAY! THAT should SCARE THE H*LL out of EVERY decent and REAL American!
 
Americans had better wake up and smell the coffee before they find themselves without a whole bunch of rights that their Founding Fathers fought for and bequeathed to them. Perhaps Patrick Henry said it best when he said, "I know not what course others may take but for me, give me liberty or give me death." 

The Constitution allows for the Federal Government to provide for the general welfare and common defense of the American people but putting the military in the streets is in a clear violation of this. Americans SHOULD BE P*SSED OFF whenever the Federal colossus tramples on the Constitution! They serve US not the other way around. You're hearing it here first folks, there is going to come a time when it is put up or kneel down and the Gunny hopes that a few million HIGHLY p*ssed off and ARMED Americans will not be afraid to forego everything and march on DC to put an end to it. He'll be there, will YOU?
 
 
The price of freedom is eternal vigilance. Thomas Jefferson
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!

Posted by GunnyG© on Tuesday, December 02, 2008 7:01:44 AM
It's a well-known fact that the Gunny HATES liberals. They're nothing but pablum-puking, bedwetting, hanky-twisting little p8ssants and Al Franken is the top of the heap, or bottom of the barrel, depending on which angle you examine the libvermin from. He has clearly been beaten, the Minnesota Board of Canvassers have ruled that he was beaten but no, the crybaby is now calling on the Senate to rule FOR HIM! What a mockery of our Constitution and Nation the liberals have created. The Hildabeast is taking the Secretary of State position, which is against the Constitution, but the libs will throw a band-aid over it, point to a historical precedent, which was also WRONG, and call it good. Al Gore made a mockery of the 2000 election with his constant whining which in turn, gave the libmorons a mewling bleat for the next eight years, undercutting the effectiveness of Bush at every turn. Remember their battle cry? "Bush was selected not elected?" Idiots.

Now Al Franken is going to whine to the liberal majority Senate to intervene to allow some disqualified absentee ballots to be counted in his favor, in order to unseat Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.). It figures that the party of lawyers is using a scummy lawyer, a shyster by the name of Marc Elias, who is whining that 1,000 absentee ballots were improperly disqualified. Let's take note again that the Minnesota Board of Canvassers, who are the ones to decide, by law, have ruled on it already. This is merely a blatant attempt to legislate (slime) his way into the Senate. Personally, the Gunny thinks that if the people of Minnesota allow this to occur, THEY DESERVE AL FRANKEN!

Now, here's a laugh since the biggest piece of dog crap in the Senate, Dingy Reid, whined that, "the Board of Canvassers’ decision to not count the absentee ballots was a cause for great concern."

HOWEVER! Back in 1974, Dingy Reid came within 624 votes of winning a seat in the United States Senate. The pile of dog squeeze naturally demanded a recount and he then lost by 611 votes. This year, Dingy Reid was up against a recount by his Republican challenger, John Ensign, and Dingy Reid has THIS to say: "Bad political move, they don't change the outcome.' (The moron won by 401 votes. Too bad for America but there it is.) But the hypocrisy is thick whenever a liberal opens their pukehole. Ensign shouldn't ask for a recount but Frankenstein can ask not only for a recount but for the SENATE to intervene for him!

 
SCREW YOU AMERICA!

Is anyone else sick and d*mned tired of the liberals constant end runs around the Constitution? Of their continued whining? Of their continued attack on American values of honesty and fair play, i.e., Senator Obama ACORN? Senator Obama SOROS? Senator Obama REZKO?
 
The moron from Minnesota's main platform can be summed up with one of his quotes, "Democrats care so much more for the poor than Republicans do. We Democrats give them money. Republicans tell them to get a job and support themselves. Yeah, right." Al Franken
 
                              
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (13) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Oh Where, Oh Where has my BAILOUT GONE?

Posted by GunnyG© on Saturday, November 29, 2008 1:42:42 PM
It is simply amazing how the Left lies so convincingly. The bailout plan for the Big Three is nothing more than a payoff to the United Auto Workers, and to the amazingly incompetent Michigan Governor Granholm, for services rendered. We're told that we CANNOT let the Big Three go under. That it would be DISASTROUS to the US economy to let them go under. Funny, but this was not the stance of the FDR Administration during the Great Depression. Why not? Perhaps the American public would have revolted at the very idea of paying OUR TAX DOLLARS, sorry EX-Congcritter Joe Knollenberg (Rino), it IS OUR MONEY, for a bailout of a company that could not compete? Evidently, today's leftist liberals and Conservative traitors say WE MUST bail out the Big Three.
 
BULLSH*T!
 
Facts on GM:

1. GM’s legacy health costs run to about $2500 a vehicle it sells in North America.
 
2. The UAW imposed a contract on GM wherein the UAW workers pay a mere 7% of their healthcare costs (27-32% US Worker average) which raises the wage rates enormously, when considering the total cost of hiring labor, including health benefits.
 
3. The UAW imposed on GM a $22 per worker-hour in legacy costs.
 
4. The UAW members are guaranteed a “30 years and out” provision. (That means that a worker can retire in their EARLY fifties on a FULL PENSION! That is, 95% of their salary.) Their 2007 health care costs was 5.5 BILLION (pensioners and 1.1 million workers) which means a bailout won't help jacksh*t unless the union is broken up, which it should have been twenty years ago.
 
5. The UAW's additional costs, when added up, amount to over $75.00 an HOUR, PER CAR! The nearest competitor is Toyota, averaging about $40.00 an hour. Small wonder since they are not located in Detroit and don't allow the UAW to dictate to them.
 
6. Like the French, UAW workers get SEVEN WEEKS OF VACATION if they have tenure (there's THAT word again) of 15 years or more.
 
7. If their factory goes under, the UAW's contracts state that the workers are transferred to a JOBS bank where they are paid nearly full wages to not work and can sit there forever, doing crosswords, sleeping, etc, all while getting paid. Sweet deal. 
 
The Gunny would like to lecture the Congcritters on elementary economics that state that the advantage of production will ALWAYS flow to more efficient competitors and those who operate LESS efficiently, will go under. That is how capitalism works but liberals want socialism, which rewards failure, and this is exactly what has been happening.
 
So what's the point? Just this, FDR did not want to bail out the following:
 
1. The Pierce-Arrow. FDR's own limousine was a Pierce-Arrow, as was Wilson's and J. Edgar Hoover's. The company failed to downsize, thinking the Depression was temporary (and it would of been except for FDR) and they could not compete. They were sold at auction in 1938.
 
2. The REO. Ransom Eli Olds' company lost its competitive edge through mismanagement (by Old mainly), and lost it all when they went bankrupt in 1935.
 
3. The Stutz Bearcat. They also could not compete and despite cost-cutting measures, went bankrupt in 1935.
 
4. The Duesenberg. They made a great car but had a poor management team. They could not compete and went bankrupt in 1937.
 
 
So here we are. The bottom line is that the bailout that the Democrats in Congress are proposing is NOT to keep the Big Three in business, it's to payoff the UAW who has carried the water for the Democrats since the 1930's. If liberals are SOOOOOOOO concerned about the "workers" where were they in the 1930's when THE ABOVE COMPANIES were going out of business? Why didn't FDR and company bail THEM out? The UAW is asking the US taxpayers to help keep them earning $75 an hour and to keep using taxpayers' money to pay billions of dollars into their newly created health care VEBA! Those benefits are far better that what the government managed Medicare system provides! It's no wonder that the UAW workers dispatched the three stooges to come begging to the Congcritters so that they, the UAW, can preserve that standard of living to which they have become accustomed and a high standard it is. Too bad for them that it is not sustainable in a competitive economy but no worries, we'll pay for it, just like we always do. The plan is that Congress is going to tax Americans so that the UAW workers won't lose their affluent lifestyles.
 
Bend over, that's unionism for you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (51) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

PRETTY CLEAR CUT-The Difference Between Them and US!

Posted by GunnyG© on Wednesday, November 26, 2008 6:43:06 AM
It truly is clear cut when looking at the babes on the right versus the libpigs on the left. Ever see a leftist wench up close? Most of them would curdle milk with a single glance and to hear them yammer on, one finds their hand searching for a shooting iron! They're so busy running everyone else's lives that the word  NAG! doesn't even BEGIN to describe them. The Gunny has an Aunt who fits that description and at family get-togethers, she usually ends up sitting alone, except for that poor schmuck who married her! haha. And even HE drifts away to the right-wing conversations going on about guns, hunting, women, cars, etc., you know, the things liberal men would LOVE to discuss if their women-folk just gave them their balls back! So here it is, the calendar we've all been waiting on (link at the bottom) with our favorite (AND HOTTTTT) conservative babes dressed in FUR! It is GUAR-AN-TEED to drive the libpukes nuts, make PETA weenies bleat and moan, and also drive us conservative men nuts. What is IT with having our women in fur? Is it the prehistoric knuckle-dragger in us that prefers our women in fur vice a Robert Redford Hemp shirt? haha. The Gunny's wife has a fur coat and man oh man! She looks good in it while making libdolts mad. Classic. Here is a pictoral review of a few of OUR babes and a few of the LIBPIGS.

                                                                           THE CONSERVATIVE BABES!
 
Pretty in Mink Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute Ann CoulterPretty in Mink Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute Star ParkerPretty in Mink Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute Kate Obenshain 
    Ann Coulter (YEOWWWWWW!)                    Star Parker (MMMMMMMM!)          Kate Obenshain (YOOOOOOO!)
 
THE LIBPIGS
 
 
                         Miss Syria 2007                     Lynne "chin whiskers" Stewart                  Miss Al-Qaeda 2001-on.
 
Other ruunners up include: Susan Estrich, Helen Thomas (YEECH!), Maddy Halfbright, and Jeanane "buffalo butt" Garofalo.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (53) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

SECOND AMENDMENT PRIMER!

Posted by GunnyG© on Tuesday, November 25, 2008 8:41:49 AM
Well, it sure did not take very long for the Messiah to appoint a cabal of anti Second Amendment, anti-Freedom, and anti-American gun grabbers, led by the Head Chekist Eric Holder himself! As noted in the previous essay on Ol Eric the Gun Grabber, this bozo is going to be in charge of the Justice Department but the Gunny asks the agents under him to ignore any UNCONSTITUTIONAL orders he gives. Remember, "I was just doing my job," did not work for the Germans at Nuremburg and it won't work now. We as Americans should THANK GOD that USAG Ashcroft wrote his opinion on the Second Amendment being an INDIVIDUAL RIGHT and this was concurred with by the SCOTUS, with the usual suspects going against it! Figures. Thus, as we head into the dark days of the Obomination, it's time once again for a primer on YOUR GOD GIVEN RIGHT, IN A FREE SOCIETY, TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.

The Second Amendment: "A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

Pretty cut and dried right? Well, for those of us with common sense (right wing) yes, but for those who want a government teat inserted in their yaps after they pull away from mommy's (left wing) no.

ONE: In religious text, LONG before the Second Amendment was ever crafted, God granted the individual right of self-defense. As free human beings, the Creator, granted the UNALIENABLE right, in other words, IT CANNOT BE STRIPPED AWAY, to self-defense. Here are several examples, both of religious text and secular law.

1. "If the thief is caught while breaking in and is struck so that he dies, there will be no bloodguiltiness on his account." Exodus 22:2. Thus it is clear, even going back to when this text was written, that homeowners had the right to defend hearth and home.

2. “If someone comes to kill you, arise quickly and kill him.” (Talmud)

3. “Someone who defends his life is not guilty of murder even if he is forced to deal his aggressor a lethal blow.” Catechism of the Catholic Church 1994, sections 2263-65. 

4. "But now whoever has a wallet must take it along, and his traveling bag, too. And the one who has no sword must sell his coat and buy one. Luke 22:36.
 
5. "The individuals have the rights to life, liberty, and property." John Locke's Second Trestise of Government (1690). The basis of this treatise by Locke was that civil government exists not to merely govern but to protect individual rights and that the people have these rights in a "state of nature." In other words, we are endowed by our Creator to possess these rights. 

6. "To be legitimate authorities, all governments must uphold man’s rights and do justice. Otherwise, the people owe a lawless and tyrannical ruler no allegiance at all." This was argued in Lex, Rex, 1644, by Samuel Rutherford, who also argued successfully that the rights of Man come from God.

7. In Rome, Cicero argued that: "we are not taught self-defence through instruction, but through natural intuition."
 
The bottom line in Part One is that the Second Amendment provides the tools that the people need to perform self-defense against aggression and intrusions of ANY KIND, being it a thief or the tyranny of a government. 

TWO: "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED." This is a very clear statement and one that cannot be successfully argued against no matter what liberals want, say, or desire. The definition of INFRINGED is: 1. To transgress or exceed the limits of; violate: infringe a contract; infringe a patent. 2. To defeat; invalidate. Thus, the Second Amendment specifically STOPS the Federal Government from “infringing” on this right of the people. They CANNOT Constitutionally void this Amendment, bypass it, or ignore it without it being a violation of our rights under the Constitution and the Law of God. What liberals like Obama, Sarah Brady, and Eric Holder fail to note is that the First Amendment specifically prevents them from INFRINGING our our RIGHT to the: freedom of speech, press, religious expression, assembly, and protest. Thus, if the liberals call freedom of the press a right, then how can they, in the same breath, deny Americans their right under the Second? Also, if the Second Amendment is voided, what is left to protect the First? Our Founding Fathers wrote the amendments the way they did for a PURPOSE! They knew that the freedom of speech for example, the freedom of UNPOPULAR speech, must be protected and sometimes that involves a weapon.

Also, it should be noted that Article I, Section 8, clauses 15 and 16 of the U.S. Constitution refer to Congress’s powers concerning the state militias. Clause 15 gives Congress the power to “call forth” the state militias into national service for specific purposes, not just because they want to, i.e., Obama's Civilian National Security Force and Clause 16 authorizes Congress to organize, arm and discipline the state militias, and to govern the militias while they are in national service. HOWEVER, the 2d Amendment is the oversight to Congress in that they cannot legislate the state militias to disband and thus, disarm “the people.”
 
In 1990, the SCOTUS observed in US v. Verdugo-Urquidez, that the word “people” in the Second Amendment referred to individuals.

THREE: "A well-regulated militia.” In Number 28 of the Federalist Papers, Alexander Hamilton stated very clearly that when a government gathers too much power and becomes a tyrant vice a servant, that "the people" are left with nothing else BUT to revolt, thus exercising their right of self-defense. That is, to fight an oppressive governmentm, which then was Britain but today, would be the nanny staters. Hamilton further stated in Number 29 that the best and only REAL defense against tyranny and a standing army, is the armed citizen. Then, aagin, it was the Redcoats quartered in people's homes while today, it could be considered that the UN's so-called Peacekeeping Force is a standing army unlawfully raised and/or Obama's Civilian National Security Force. In fact, it should also be noted that James Madison, in Number 46, specifically stated that the ULTIMATE authority resides in THE PEOPLE and if the government became tyrannical and overreached (as we are seeing the start of now), that the people SHOULD develop plans to resist AND to resort to the use of arms to stop it. A "well-regulated militia" means a well-trained force capable of action since there was no National Guard around and even when liberals seize on THAT thread, it's moot. The NG is comprised of the people and can, by law, only be federalized for a specific task and time.

What you MUST DO as Free Citizens in a Free Country.

READ:

1. The Constitution.
2. The Bill of Rights.
http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
3. Review the AUTHORIZED powers of the Federal Government.
4. KNOW the 1st, 2d, 4th, 9th, and 10th Amendments BY HEART!

In closing, once you review the above material think about how the federal government can justify their need to regulate firearms? While there should be a background check to ensure nuts, felons, terrorists, and illegal aliens cannot purchase a firearm, there should be LITTLE else regulated in regards to the legal owndership of a firearm. Now liberals will whine and bleat saying, "what do you want to do, own a bazooka?" If you can afford it, YES! If you have the land to use it, YES!  If you are a law abiding citizen, YES! If you are a collector, YES! But the common man and woman, like those of us reading this, must NEVER EVER surrender our RIGHT to own firearms. Just as there is no such thing as unreasonable bail, for example, there should be no UNREASONABLE tax on guns, ammo, powder, reloading supplies, etc. THAT, my friends, would be akin to the Stamp Act of 1765 that infuriated Americans since it was enacted merely to help Britain pay for their Empire on the backs of Americans. Thus, if the Federal Government passed, say, a 100% tax on ammunition, and the liberals have proposed this before, then THAT is an oppressive act designed to make it difficult, if not IMPOSSIBLE for us to supply ourselves with the wherewithal to defend ourselves with, from criminal scum or an oppressive government. As Ben Franklin stated: "We must, indeed, all hang together or, most assuredly, we shall all hang separately." The right to keep and bear arms is an AMERICAN RIGHT and not one to be trifled with.
 
 
ENOUGH SAID!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (54) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA's GUN GRABBER ATTORNEY GENERAL

Posted by GunnyG© on Monday, November 24, 2008 9:35:21 PM
Boy, it sure didn't take long for the liberals to gather their team of gun grabbers to initiate their gun confiscation schemes, after all, it's what their lord and master, Obama's puppetmaster George Soros wants! Open borders and an unarmed population, with UN protection. It's all laid out at his website, Open Borders Institute! If you ever read that they've taken Gunny G's weapons, then you'll know that Gunny G is dead. But getting back to the hoplophobes, Obomination's AG is now Eric Holder, who joined forces with the architect of Waco, Janet Reno, to co-sign an amicus brief in District of Columbia v. Heller. It wasn't enough that honest law-abiding citizens were kept from protecting themselves and their families by DC's draconian gun ban (that allowed thugs to have guns) they were bound and determined to prevent any CHANGE to 1974 gun ban that was not working, thus denying HOPE to DC residents. Their little brief was filed TO SUPPORT the ban on all handguns, and BANNED the use of any firearm for self-defense in the home. Naturally, the communists called the Second Amendment a "collective" right (they'd know about collectivism), not an individual one, which flies in the face of EVERYTHING written on the 2d Amendment in early American history.

Oh, by the way, Eric Holder was WACO Reno's Deputy AG! Even MORE SCARY is the oral argument before the Fifth Circuit in United States v. Emerson, where these hoplophobes actually had the audacity to tell the panel that the Second Amendment was no barrier to gun confiscation! They even went so far as to state that the confiscation of guns from on-duty National Guardsmen was permitted! The Gunny figures that this was said to pave the way for Obomination's Civilian National Security Force aka The Hitler Youth. 

Eric Holder stands for: 

1. A strong supporter of restrictive gun control.
2. Advocates federal licensing of handgun owners.
3. A three day waiting period on handgun sales.
4. Rationing handgun sales to no more than one per month.
5. Banning possession of handguns and so-called "assault weapons".
6. A gun show restriction bill that would have given the federal government the power to shut down all gun shows.
7. National gun registration (but no National ID for voter registration)
8. Mandatory prison sentences for trivial offenses (e.g., giving your child an heirloom handgun for their birthday if they were not over 21.)
9. He lies and used bogus facts like: "Every day that goes by, about 12, 13 more children in this country die from gun violence". This is an outright lie unless one deems 18-year-old gangsters who shoot each other as "children!" (Sources: Holder testimony before House Judiciary Committee, Subcommitee on Crime, May 27,1999; Holder Weekly Briefing, May 20, 2000. One of the bills that Holder endorsed is detailed in my 1999 Issue Paper "Unfair and Unconstitutional.")
10. A new law should give "the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms a record of every firearm sale."
11. All PROSPECTIVE gun buyers should be checked against the secret "watch lists" compiled by various government entities.

After the ILLEGAL and UNCONSTITUTIONAL GUN BAN was chucked out, Holder bleated that: "it opens the door to more people having more access to guns and putting guns on the streets." Evidently, it's okay for CRIMINALS to have guns but not law abiding citizens.

And let's not forget, Ol' Eric played a pivotal role in sending Elian Gonzalez, at the point of a gun, by a paramilitary invasion of an AMERICAN CITIZEN's HOME, back to a communist h*llhole named Cuba. The Feds came in with guns drawn because, get this, SOMEONE in the family MIGHT have been licensed to carry a handgun under Florida law. Only a liberal idiot like Holder could believe that breaking down a door with a battering ram, agents running in screaming, "Get down, get down, or we'll shoot", pointing guns in every direction and at kids is acting "very sensitively," then this is just ANOTHER example of Obumbler's P*SS POOR judgment. Having Eric Holder in charge of thousands of armed federal agents, many of them paramilitary agents with machine guns, backed by Soros money and the leadership of his puppet Obambi, is downright scary.

ENEMY OF THE SECOND AMENDMENT!
ENEMY OF FREEDOM!

http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/BriefforFormerDOJOfficialsasAmiciCuriae.pdf
http://davekopel.org/2A/LawRev/Guns-Gangs-Preschools.htm
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11295.html
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (21) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The CREEPINESS of the Cult of OBAMA!

Posted by GunnyG© on Sunday, November 23, 2008 7:07:16 PM
Now THIS is creepy. (Isn't that what the pundits said about The Chosen One who gave his victory speech sans family and sans Biden?) Here is a stenciled paint job of The Mystical Magical Negro (LA Times) that was spotted in Bezerkely Caulifornication. Anyone who has read 1984 will remember the big pictures of Big Brother and of course, we see this type of cult worship in communist countries where pictures of Che (the college kids love his t-shirts), Castro, Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin, Lenin, etc are plastered everywhere to remind the sheep how to think and how to act. The Great Leader is watching you. Less is More. Peace is War. Big Brother loves you. He knows your thoughts.
 
graffiti face
 
How long before his face is everywhere? Orwell was right.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (64) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

TEAM OBAMA STACKS THE BULLSQUEEZE HIGHER AND HIGHER!

Posted by GunnyG© on Friday, November 21, 2008 6:46:55 PM
The idiots on The Messiah's team are ALREADY backpedaling! This clown made promise after promise and here are few of them:
 
1. He would repeal the "Don't ask, Don't tell" rule for the military.
2. He would fix health care (est cost $1.2 trillion over ten years. Estimation from the Lewin Group)
3. 95% of Americans will get a tax cut!
4. He will give businesses a $3,000 tax credit for each new job created.
5. He will raise taxes on businesses (so much for creating jobs, see #4)
6. He will lower health care premiums by $2,500.
7. He will pull out of Iraq right away.
8. He will give free college for everyone.
9. He will fix the economy.
10. He will create a new "Making Work Pay" tax credit of up to $500 per person, or $1,000 per working family.
11. He will fight for a trade policy that opens up foreign markets to support good American jobs.
12. He will use trade agreements to spread good labor and environmental standards around the world.
 
And most importantly, Obama stated that he will CHANGE THE WORLD!
 
HOLD THE PRESSES!

Robert Reich (Bubba's SecLabor) now Emperor Obama's economic stooge mewled: "This might be a long haul. 2009 is going to be a very hard year. Some economists say we won't be out of this for two years, others are saying it may be three, or four, maybe five years. We all have to be very careful about the expectations that we are putting on this man, our president-elect. If we all assume it's going to be the first 100 days, we're going to be disappointed."
 
David Axelrod (Obama's teleprompter operator) whines: "We are inheriting an array problems unlike any president has faced, maybe since Franklin Roosevelt in 1932. It's not going to be easy, not going to be quick."
 
Rick Jasculca (This clown worked Carter, Clinton, and Clinton...a three time loser!) "If people see you reaching across the aisle and they see you making progress, going forward rather than going backward, I think people will give you the benefit of the doubt."
 
Really Ricky? Peggy the Moocher wants her gas tank filled and her mortgage paid. She ain't gonna wait! This is SO typical of liberals. They promise all things to all people, promising free giveaways, just to get elected. Then it's well, "The road ahead will be long. Our climb will be steep. We may not get there in one year or even one term...There will be setbacks and false starts. There are many who wont agree with every decision or policy I make as President, and we know that government can't solve every problem." Barack Obama 4 Nov 2008.
 
What a hoot. The clown promises the world to the Obamatrons and then on the very night he wins, he starts to backpedal. He promises total government cradle-to-grave help and then it's, well, we know the government blah blah blah. He promises CHANGE and then brings in old Carter hacks and Clintonites, with HITLERY HERSELF as Secretary of State and that is change? The Gunny figures that if liberals put lipstick on a pig, they'd call it Janet Reno! The face and voice of the President is SHRILLARY! Good GOD, the next four years are gonna be one joke after another! Hopefully we'll live through them! His Attorney General is the SAME GUY who bought Marc Rich's pardon from Bubba for a cool 1,000,000 dollar contribution from his wife Denise to Bubba's Presidential combination Library and Massage Parlor. This is RICH [pun intended.]
 
 
The OFFICIAL song of the Obama Presidency
as sung by an Obamatron:
 
Never had a doubt
In the beginning
Never a doubt
Trusted too true
In the beginning
I loved you right through
Arm in arm we laughed like kids
At all the silly things we did

You made me promises, promises
Knowing I'd believe
Promises, promises
You knew you'd never keep

Second time around
I'm still believing
Words that you said
You said you'd always be here
In love forever
Still repeats in my head
You can't finish what you start
If this is love it breaks my heart

You made me promises, promises
You knew you'd never keep
Promises, promises
Why do I believe

You made me promises, promises
You knew you'd never keep
Promises, promises
Why do I believe
All of your promises
You knew you'd never keep
Promises, promises
Why do I believe
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (110) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AS DID STALIN, SO DO AMERICAN LIBERALS

Posted by GunnyG© on Friday, November 21, 2008 9:37:17 AM
Liberals have taken a page from Stalin's playbook with the advancing their agenda and power. As the Gunny stated, they seek to create a victim class. Here is the example of how the liberals seek to do this. Think of liberal's rhetoric on how we should drive, how we should set our thermostats, what we need to sacrifice, etc, as you read this.

From Soviet novelist Chingiz Aitmatov:

"On one occasion, so it was narrated, Stalin called for a live chicken and proceeded to use it to make an unforgettable point before some of his henchmen. Forcefully clutching the chicken in one hand, with the other he began to systematically pluck out its feathers. As the chicken struggled in vain to escape, he continued with the painful denuding until the bird was completely stripped. “Now you watch,” Stalin said as he placed the chicken on the floor. To the surprise of Stalin's audience the chicken stopped struggling and fighting and became very docile, snuggling peacefully between Stalin's feet. Stalin then explained that without its feathers to keep its body heat inside, the chicken would quickly die of the cold if it stayed in the shade and, lacking any pigmentation to protect its skin from the sun, its skin would beseverely burned if it ventured into the sun for warmth. Stalin threw a handful of grain to the bird, and it began to follow him around the room, he turned to his dumbfounded colleagues and said quietly, “This is the way to rule the people. Did you see how that chicken followed me for food, even though I had caused it such torture? People are like that chicken. If you inflict inordinate pain on them they will follow you for food the rest of their lives." 

Make us your slaves but feed us...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (48) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

OBAMA DOES IT AGAIN!

Posted by GunnyG© on Friday, November 21, 2008 7:26:00 AM
If you thought that the liberals were serious about drilling for oil both offshore, inshore (Bekkan Fields) and in ANWR, like they voted to BEFORE the election, think again. They lied. What they did is what liberals ALWAYS DO. They do a few sound bites, a little shuck and jive, and it's all good for their cult followers. The liberals in Congress WERE NEVER serious about America's need for energy independence and even His Highness Lordship Obama stated on the rise of gas prices to $4.00+: "I think that I would have preferred a gradual adjustment." There you have it from The Messiah folks. A GRADUAL rise in the price of gas per gallon would have been better. Why? Because the American people are so stupid and so sheeplike that they would not have REALIZED, like a frog dropped into a pot of cold water, that the BURNER WAS LIT! We ARE getting screwed by the government and the Gunny is here to tell you, and here it comes in capital letters, GET READY FOR A GAS TAX HIKE OF DOUBLE DIGITS PERCENTAGE! Liberals WANT us dependent on foreign energy for several reasons.

1. WE shell out our money to dictators like Chavez and Ahmadinejad. This enables them to have the necessary hard currency to raise armies, start troubles in neighboring countries, and give us grief whenever possible.

2. WE cannot build refineries or drill for oil so that keeps new businesses from springing up and oil workers from having steady jobs. WHY? To create a victim class large enough to "force" government to act and increase welfare, food stamps, unemployment benefits, etc, to "assist" the very workers THEY KEEP FROM WORKING!

3. WE get the sh*t end of the stick in the form of lessened national security because we have to IMPORT oil vice being self-sufficient. Think of it like this. The Gunny has the ranch upstream from you. You and your cows rely on that water. You are my competition. The Gunny dams the river. You get no water until you comply with his wishes. Once again we see that Liberals ARE WEAK on national security!

So, to the fight. The Messiah did it again folks. He appointed the ugliest man in Congress, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) as Chairman of the House Committee that handles all energy, climate change and health care legislation! Who is Nostrilus you ask?

Here is the scoop on Dhimmicrat Henry Waxman. He gave a letter to CODE PINK antiwar activists to facilitate their delivery of aid to the terrorists who were killing Marines in Fallujah, Iraq. NO WAY GUNNY YOU SAY? Check this little nugget of information out.

In the publication "Peace and Resistance," (NOT EVEN close to being a right-wing information source) posted on January 1 2005, that Rep. Waxman had written a letter addressed to the American ambassador in Amman, Jordan to help ease transit through Customs of $600,000 worth of medical supplies and cash collected by the anti-American groups Code Pink and Global Exchange. The idiot running Code Pink, serial kook and abject traitor Medea Benjamin stated outright that the aid is for the insurgents aka, the foreign fighters and terrorists from every other country except Iraq.
 
What happened? The letter was being carried by Fernando Suarez Del Solar, an antiwar activist whose Marine son, 20-year-old Jesus A Suarez del Solar Novaro, was killed in Iraq on March 27, 2003. 

The response? One Iraqi, who learned that the parents of American soldiers killed while liberating his country were sending aid to the terrorists stated in disbelief: "what kind of people would help those killing their own sons and daughters?"
 
What kind you ask? Traitorous idiots.
 
So, the very idiot elected by cultists, Oblahma, who is NOW calling for urgent action on climate change (disregarding the fact that the global temps are down and have been since 1998) stuck a clown to run the committee and be MORE aggressive on energy and the environment.

This is a victory for the enviro-nazis, who want a crippled American economy and all of us riding bicycles to work. Not horses mind you, they f*rt methane but bicycles. Have you ever moved suddenly and your hand hit a glass or vase, and it fell off of the table or counter and in slow motion, seemed to hang in the air for a split second? You think you can grab it but is slowly falls away to smash on the floor. This is the future for America my friends, that is, a Congress stuffed full of unhinged moonbat leftists, led by The Mystical Magical Negro (LA Times) who will back to the Nth degree, his plans to destroy America's economy so that socialism can be imposed. What people don;t seem to realize is that once YOU ARE ON THE GOV'T TEAT, they can shut it off at will if you get out of line.

"Better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep." Roman proverb.

We truly are in the early days of an American Revolution.

                                                                        rep-henry-waxman.jpg
 
HENRY WAXMAN: Ugly AND Stupid.
A lethal combination for America.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (24) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THE RINO HENCHMEN EXPOSED!

Posted by GunnyG© on Thursday, November 20, 2008 8:20:39 AM

Rep. Joe Knollenberg, R-Mich., made the remark during a discussion with Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto yesterday as the pair debated sending billions of federal dollars to prop up the Big Three carmakers.

 
Dialogue:
Cavuto: "When the housing industry CEOs come to you and say, 'You know, [if] we go under and all the ancillary businesses – the dishwasher manufacturers, the washer-and-dryer manufacturers, the Lowe's and the Home Depots that vastly depend on our being alive and vibrant – if we go under, there's hell to pay. And then the textile manufacturer comes to you and says, 'If we go down, there's hell to pay.' And on and on and on we go. Where do you draw the line with our money?"

"It is not your money," said Knollenberg.

Cavuto screamed back, "It is! It is taxpayers money!"
 
THIS is one of the 535 CLOWNS in Congress. An economic IDIOT running the country and a blue-blood RINO! THIS IS THE RINO HENCHMEN that have TORPEDOED our Reagan Revolution by being tax dollar eating-earmark sh*tting PIGS! This clown can't even understand that the tax dollars come from US! And we thought LIBERALS WERE STUPID? Are there ANY ADULTS left in Michigan to give that state (and us) decent leadership? It should be noted that Knollenberg was in Congress for 16 years and was defeated in november by Democrat Gary Peters. He will be the first Democrat to hold that district since 1893! THAT, my friends, is what happens when WE ABANDON Conservatism for RINOism! The Gunny IS D*MN MAD AND HE WANTS YOU TO BE MAD WITH HIM! WAKE UP RNC! 
 
A bailout of the Big Three is NOTHING MORE than a bailout of the UAW and the blithering idiot from Canada, Socialist Granholm.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (80) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

LIBERAL MEDIA LIED! AMERICA DIED!

Posted by GunnyG© on Wednesday, November 19, 2008 6:58:15 AM
Our Founding Fathers are probably watching the goings-on of this once great nation and weeping. They sacrificed SO MUCH to create a nation consisting of a FREE PEOPLE and we've basically chucked it into the sh*t can. The below is not just an indictment of the liberal press who, led by Chrissy "Tingly Feelings" Matthews, had their lips firmly affixed to The Obomination's a**end but also an indictment of the BARELY functional idiots that our public school systems turn out every year. For 22 LONG AGONIZING MONTHS it was open season for the liberal press to hang their lips on the edge of The Chosen One's jock, waiting for their chance to service their master. They so effectively butt snorkled the Mystical Magical Negro (LA Times) that they simply threw objectivity out of the window AND NO ONE CARED! But our public school systems have so crippled the critical thinking skills of Americans that even IF the press was busy Lewinsky'ing Oblahma, Americans SHOULD HAVE SEEN RIGHT THROUGH THE SMOKE SCREEN! But sadly, no. They heard the hype. They heard the slogans. They heard the bumper sticker speeches and sound bites. And they voted for the empty suit from Daley's corrupt politikal machine in Sh*tcago.

Now things are coming to light like Obomination's cabinet choices, his terrorists and racist buddies NOW speaking out about their past, and that Obama plans to scream: HARD LEFT RUDDER! on 20 January 2009.

And Americans are begining to ask, "how could this have happened?" The Gunny has one word for it: LIBERALISM!

America, you asked for it and you got it. Leadership by a leftist group of radicals led by an immature, empty-suit, man-child. And as your children are forced into mandatory community service and the future Civilian National Security Force aka Brownshirts, remember, YOU VOTED FOR HIM, the Gunny DID NOT! So don't blame ME! The Gunny will be busy with the Conservative Resistance Movement.

What makes this even more upsetting is that the information WAS OUT THERE but the reality of it as exposed by a Zogby poll, is that American Idol was WAY MORE important that finding out the gouge on this clown. For example:

1. 57.4% could NOT correctly say which party controls congress (50/50 shot just by guessing).

2. 81.8% could NOT correctly say Joe Biden quit a previous campaign because of plagiarism (25% chance by guessing).

3. 82.6% could NOT correctly say that Barack Obama won his first election by getting opponents kicked off the ballot (25% chance by guessing).

4. 88.4% could NOT correctly say that Obama said his policies would likely bankrupt the coal industry and make energy rates skyrocket (25% chance by guessing).

5. 56.1% could NOT correctly say Obama started his political career at the home of two former members of the Weather Underground (25% chance by guessing).