Posted by
GunnyG on Monday, July 07, 2008 6:43:29 AM
Ever stop and wonder how America got so screwed up? Liberals, along with their lickspittle allies in the Lame Stream Media have worked hard to blame all of America's ills on the Right but when the facts of it all are exposed to the light of day, it's apparent for anyone with a working brain that the decline of America started with the liberals running the White House, the House and Senate and a group of senile vermin in black robes. William F. Buckley saw it back in the early 50's and wrote about it in "God and Man at Yale" albeit on a small scale but there is more, much more. For example, if you like rampant crime, then the liberal SCOTUS rulings in 1960's and 70's are right up your alley.
1. Mapp v Ohio (1961): The SCOTUS managed to squeeze out of their rear-facing orifice, the exclusionary rule that has kept more criminals OUT of jail than the lies of Billary and O-Vomit combined! These brainiacs in black thought that it's far more important for a criminal to go free, to rob, rape, and murder innocent people than to be convicted by "tainted fruit." Instead of examining the evidence for what it is, they just throw it out. If a police officer finds, say, the bloody clothes of a raped and murdered child, it can be thrown out if the court says that the police officer...did not follow the rules. So criminals educate themselves to the law and use it against us.
2. Escobedo v Illinois (1964): On the heels of Mapp, the five liberals ruled once more against the people of the United States by allowing a confession to be thrown out with these words of wisdom from Justice Goldberg, "Any system of administration which permits the prosecution to trust habitually to compulsory self-disclosure as a source of proof must itself suffer morally thereby." Hmm, it was okay for the liberals to endorse the kangaroo courts of Stalin when NY Times reporter Walter Duranty said that the USSR was a paradise on Earth but accepting the confessions of scumbags here in America is bad? Typically, this screw over law enforcement since a criminal is the sole person who knows the full details of his/her crimes. Thus, say, a scumbag kidnaps, rapes, and murders a child, buries the body in the woods, and later, refuses to say where the body is since, it might incriminate him/her. So a turd goes free while a family is refused closure. One has to wonder if libvermin would pass such fecal matter if THEIR children were at risk like ours are but since they're in the finest neighborhoods and schools that money can buy, it's unlikely.
3. Miranda v Arizona (1966): This is the jewel in the crown of a brain dead SCOTUS. The Warren Court, the same ones who concocted the "magic bullet" theory in the JFK assassination, served up a b*ttload of pablum with this one. A little history lesson is in order here. Miranda, probably an illegal alien, admitted to rape and kidnapping after being interrogated for two hours by the evil police. He was convicted but the senile liberals on the SCOTUS rode in on jackasses and ruled in a 5-4 decision that Miranda was not informed of his right to a mouthpiece before his questioning. Nothing is said about the rights of his victims to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness...which includes not being raped, not being kidnapped, etc. Clearly this is a great moment in libstain history since Liberal Bobblehead Tom Brokejaw orally ejaculated in 1996 that evil Republicans don't care about rape (1996 RNC Convention) yet it's the liberals who have carried the water for scum like Miranda and serial rapists like Bill Clinton. What you NEVER hear from the libstains is that Miranda was later RECONVICTED in a retrial! It's not noted on what a retrial cost the US taxpayer. But what-the-h*ll, it's OPM right libs? (OPM = Other People's Money).
4. Brewer v Williams (1977): This is exactly what happened in this ruling. In short, a murderer, Robert Williams, confessed where he buried a ten year-old girl that he had raped and murdered. The SCOTUS threw out the confession saying that the poor child rapist/murderer was deprived of his right to a lawyer. They did not mention whether or not Pamela Powers had a right-to-life or not but considering their stance on abortion, it's doubtful.
How Miranda screws us. Professor Paul Cassell and Professor Richard Fowles wrote: "
Criminal Law: True Confessions about Miranda's Legacy," 5 August 1996
. The Heritage Foundation discusses this here (
http://www.heritage.org/Research/PoliticalPhilosophy/BG1089.cfm) but the bottom line is that Miranda prevents to solving of about 100,000 violent crimes a year but then again, as we've noticed in the past, liberals care
FAR MORE for the rights of violent scumbags than they do for the rights of fetuses or legitimate citizens. Prof. Cassell writes: "Our equations suggest that clerance rates for violent crimes would be several points higher without Miranda, with the result that each year police would solve an additional 100,000-plus violent crimes." Thanks Warren Court. Not to be outdone in liberal stupidity, moonbat Lucas Powe, Jr., who is actually ALLOWED to TEACH (WTF OVER!) law at the University of Texas at Austin bleated this jewel about the Warren Court, that libstain legal mouthpieces have a "religious and mystical" view of the Warren Court. (NY Law Journal, 8 May 2000.)
In reading the dissention of Miranda, the Conservative viewpoint is aptly summated in the words of Justice J.M. Harlan, "the Court was engaging in dangerous experimental with society's criminal laws." No lie there and it should not surprise ANY Conservative that liberals LOVE playing around with the rules, laws, and mores of the land. In fact, they've done it in the schools with forced diversification, forced multi-culturalism, Kwanzaa, shared supplies (socialism), gay day, advanced sex education, etc, etc, ad nauseum. They've done it in the Armed Forces with "Don't ask, don't tell," and they, the libscum, are pushing hard to allow h0m0s to serve openly in the US military but they won't allow men who love women to shower up together. Sounds like discrimination to the Gunny. They've done it in society by eroding religious values, patriot values (Obambi not wearing a flag pin and holding his crotch during the National Anthem for example), and finally, their open attack on the Constitution by trying to make it a living breathing document instead of the finest document ever created by FREE MEN!
Oddly enough, (not to a libdolt however) just one measly year AFTER Miranda was foisted on America by liberals, NY County D.A. Frank Hogan stated that confessions by scumbags in his jurisdiction had fallen from 49% to 14%. Again, thanks liberals. Just a short note on Miranda, Reinquist upheld it simply because the case is a precedent. Again, if something BAD hangs around long enough, let's keep it simply because... THIS is the kind of thinking that gives us Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and a host of other crappy programs that never seem to go away. Kinda like a "living and breathing" Constitution right libs?
Liberals are PROUD of releasing the dregs of society on us, to perform their acts of scumbaggery on us, over and over, until they're removed from our midst by a citizen who ventilates their forehead with a .45acp or the State who finally, after a decade or two on Death Row, finally executes them, to the dismay of the Catholic Church, Amnesty Int'l, and assorted other groups h*llbent on the surrender of Western Civilization to the barbarians. In a surrealistic quote, a liberal moron with an IQ of an ant, appointed by Truman to the DC Circus Court, or is it the DC Kangaroo Court, from 1962-78, Judge Bazelon mewled that the punishment of criminal vermin was dehumanizing and that society's "need" to punish them was done from a primitive and vindictive urge to get even with them. Evidently, America's libdolts were listening to his every word as the punishment of criminal vermin has gotten less and less as the years go by and crimes keep rising. Not to mention the black-robed idiots issuing a MORITORIUM on the DEATH PENALTY in a total usurpation of State's Rights to punish scum as THEY see fit.
If you were an adult in 1967 and paying attention, you'd remember the appointing of a total liberal a**hat by the name of Ramsey (not the condom brand) Clark to the AGUSA position by liberal tax and spender Lyndon "I wanna play general" Johnson. One of the first things that the defender of Saddam Hussein did was to utter, "Prisons are usually little more than places to keep people." No one can verify if Clark was stoned to the gills when he said that or not but The Gunny suspects that he was hitting the Kool-aid bottle AND the smoking the ganja weed like gangbusters!
The Gunny figures that a few liberal weenies will show up and bleat like the sheep they are but the proof is in the pudding. Liberal's criminal policies result in things like Arthur Shawcross' finding their way back into society, time and time again. Don't know who Shawcross is? In 1972, he raped and murdered a ten year old boy and then followed that heinous act with another by raping and murdering an eight year old girl. He was sentenced to 25 years in prison. Never fear, however, liberals rode to his rescue. Mario Cuomo's parole board appointees PAROLED this sack of sh*t in 1987, after only fifteen years in prison. Shawcross repaid this liberal kindness by murdering eleven more NYers after he was paroled to Rochester (but no one told the neighborhood Cuomo's morons put him in or the police). He finally got life in prison while his victims stayed dead and their families still grieved.
In closing, liberal activist judges can ALWAYS be expected to screw America and Americans over. From Perry v Johnson, Stanford v Kentucky, and Bowers v Hardwick, the liberals in black robes HAVE OVERRULED decisions made by the respective States and prevented justice from being served. One has to wonder if criminals were renamed "fetuses" that liberals would be more apt to kill them. Probably. If violent criminals would only prey more on liberals and their kin, then one day, we might wake up to find laws that try and execute these vermin as fast as is humanly possible. Doubtful, but a nice thought anyway. They, the criminals,(and the libs too) have PROVEN that they cannot live within the boundaries set in society so why must WE have to suffer for THEM? Liberals CONSTANTLY meddle with things that WORK, turning them into things that are BROKE, and then WALK AWAY FROM IT UNSCATHED! With liberals in charge, we're gonna have this crap stuffed down our throats until we finally rise up and say ENOUGH!