About Me

Name: GunnyG©
Email: libsmustdie@gmail.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Jimmy Carter Part Two...conclusion

Posted by GunnyG© on Tuesday, May 20, 2008 9:25:13 AM
It’s plain to anyone who can see that the various programs implemented by American liberals in the '60s fell apart one after another, as liberals raised taxes and implemented draconian and often moronic bureaucratic rules that did more to keep people dependent on that government teat than work to make them productive and independent-minded citizens. Indeed, LBJ’s interference with the war in Vietnam, adding more and more stupid political rules of engagement, ensured that Vietnam would end up a tangled mess and an ultimate failure. As their social programs: welfare, affirmative action, medicare, medicaid, the war on crime, urban renewal, the war on poverty (now over 7 trillion and counting), industrial regulations, domestic energy policies, criminal justice reform, more and more tax laws stifling businesses all became huge disasters and then textbook examples of how liberals awaken each day with a clean slate devoid of the mistakes they made the day prior. It was open season on the American taxpayer’s wallet and the lunatics were running the asylum. Thus, the liberals entered into their convention of 1968, with no new ideas since Columbus landed in the New World, a total failure of their party’s ideals, and smelly hordes of anti-war hippies, tied to the liberal’s necks by John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Jane Fonda, and other radical liberals.

In an awesome display of blatant immaturity, hippie rioters ran rampant in the streets of  downtown Chicago, attacking the police, wrecking cars, and destroying other people’s property. Inside the convention, the libs bickered with one another like children fighting over a toy, and made NO attempts to end the hippie’s running amok. Indeed, the liberals refused to even talk or plead with the vermin to get them to end their rioting. The 1968 Chicago convention chronicled the end of “blue-dog” FDR style of liberalism that worked for the GOOD of America, loved America, worked FOR American ideals, and looked out for the little man. Even the liberally-controlled media covered the convention and highlighted liberals as ineffective leaders unable to even control a group of smelly unwashed hippies, high on the drugs of their choice. Media coverage revealed American liberals as incapable of controlling their own constituency, much less directing a country.  Liberalism was on-the-ropes and put there by radical miscreants and malcontents who demanded a free ride through life even as they hurled dirty diapers, empty bottles, and spit at the returning GI’s who had served their nation in a war the liberals started and expanded and then lost.

The party of appeasement and surrender then did what they do best, they surrendered the reins of the Democrat Party to the radical hippies who were well-steeped in Socialism and who identified themselves with groups like the VC, NVA, Pol Pot’s thugs, the SLA, Weathermen (Obambi’s buddy Ayers ran that show), and just about any other socialist/communist group that stuck their middle finger up to the USA or bombed and/or shot down their American brethren. Again, liberal leaders did nothing to stop it or speak out against it, kind of like Islamic leaders in America never speaking out against al-qaeda or other radical islamics. But 1968 was not the worst that the liberals could foist on America when they trotted out George McGovern in 1972 for the POTUS slot, who, only twenty-four years earlier, had served as a useful idiot Henry Wallace (a front-man for world communism) when he ran for the presidency in 1948!

The bottom line about modern liberalism is their total addiction to fixing problems with huge sweeping programs that end up costing titanic amounts of other people’s money and then fail miserably on the same huge scale. For example, FDR’s New Deal, set up in 1933, not only made the Depression go on longer than it needed to, but laid the groundwork for government-run, socialist-style nanny-statism. Indeed, the New Deal worked hard to collectivize American companies, through the use of a stacked deck in the SCOTUS, to try to force the economy out of the Depression. In violation of every economic principle, it predictably failed and in a large manner. The New Deal, with a few minutes of research and reading, can be exposed for liberal fascism and abject socialism. The New Deal turned out to be a Raw Deal for America as by 1938, the USA was in poorer shape than in 1933! Indeed, FDR’s Raw Deal turned out laborious economic programs that addressed everything under the sun but the fundamental responses to a sputtering economy like: ending internal and external tariffs, easing credit to consumers, lowering taxes across the board, and waiting for the free market to equalize the situation. This was proven as a viable measure when Bush implemented such policies after 11 September 2001, and the economy picked up, much to the dismay of the liberals. Liberal economic policies are akin to building a rocket and then loading it down with extraneous weight and powering it with the motor from a hair dryer!

Another point of modern liberalism is their attempt to grab the moral high ground and their claim that they govern better than the Republicans do. Maybe if we count how they regulate and tax and spend, then yes, they govern better. But in reality, learning from FDR, liberals are using FDR and Tammany Hall style tactics of constituent favors, services, and plain old style communist centralized planning, liberals came to dominate the Northeast and Upper Midwest. Once glance at Detroit, Flint, Camden, Cleveland, Buffalo, and other cities that once had striving industries, should be proof enough that liberals like Carter, Clinton, Obama, should never rise higher than the position of dogcatcher. Liberals in the 60’s and afterwards crowed about a monopoly on looking out for the average joe and jane with social compassion and social justice (welfarism and a redistribution of other people’s money) while making the GOP (who took it lying down) look like a bunch of gun-toting rednecks, theocratic loons, and serial racists. And the sheep fell for it all. They fell for it so much so that in thirty YEARS plus of NO new ideas, NO real accomplishments, and NO new political doctrine, liberalism still lumbers along, draining resources, stifling the economy, and producing Marxist drones like Obama, Hillary, Pelosi and criminals like Bill Clinton, MILCON Diane Feinstein, Land Deal Reid, Freezer Money Jefferson, ABSCAM Murtha, etc, etc.

It was modern liberalism that gave us Carter who is SOLELY responsible for a prime rate had rose to 20% (try buying a house NOW!), inflation skyrocketed to a whopping 12.5%, and our national unemployment was a staggering 7.5%! Liberalism did nothing but implement their traditional solution, throw money at it. On the foreign scale, modern liberalism (and Carter) are SOLEY responsible for allowing our former Iranian allies to come under the thumb of maniacal mullahs, who still STONE people to death! Modern liberalism (and Carter) are SOLELY responsible for Iran’s killing of U.S. soldiers in Iraq with things like EFP’s, RPGs, and IED’s manufactured in Iran. Modern liberalism (and Carter) are SOLELY responsible for getting 150 Iranian generals tortured and executed after Carter urged them to follow the Ayatollah Khomeini! Modern liberalism (and Carter) are SOLELY responsible for 52 Americans being held HOSTAGE for 444 days as Carter twisted his hanky and bleated like a sheep! Only when Reagan, who firmly told the Iranians that HE WOULD NOT PLAY WITH THEM, was elected, were they released. In fact, they were on the plane as Reagan was being sworn-in.

Yesterday, Obama was whining about his wife coming under attack for HER COMMENTS on the campaign trail. He bleated: "If they think that they're going to try and make Michelle and issue in this campaign, they should be careful because I find that unacceptable, the notion that you start attacking my wife or family." Now WHAT will Obambi do when, say, President “I’m-in-a-Jihad” doesn’t do what Obambi wants him to during his unconditional talks that  Obambi says he will do. Tell the Iranian nutjob that if he doesn’t do what Hussein Obambi wants him to do he’ll:

a. Hold his breath until he turns blue?
b. Throw a temper tantrum?
c. Cry and pout?
d. Take his ball and go home?
e. All of the above?

Obambi has NOTHING to offer America in the way of experience or achievements, just like Jimmy the Dhimmi. Jimmy the Dhimmi consorted with the KGB to try and discredit Reagan and foul the campaign! Lying down with dogs and getting up with fleas seems to be a liberal trait as Obambi has consorted with scum like Tony Rezko (he barely knew him don’t ya know?), “rev” Wright (he sat for 20 years and never heard the racist screed), Bill Ayers (bomber of US buildings, co-founder of the Weather Underground, and trampler of the US Flag). He [Obambi] was only eight during those years, was the excuse offered. The Dhimmicrat Party, the stronghold of modern liberalism, is in reality nothing more than a group who’s leaders (from top to bottom) would be better off running a Third World nation rife with greed, corruption, and incompetence than running the SOLE superpower in the world.It seems that the liberals LOVE to mudwrestle with the scum of humanity, from Castro, to Chavez, to Kim Il, to Rezko, Norman Hsu, and on and on and on (http://www.investors.com/editorial/editorialcontent.asp?secid=1501&status=article&id=252633226827963)

Yet Jimmy the Dhimmi speaks for the Dhimmicrat Party with a tone of thinly veiled anti-Semitism. He, like Obambi would if he could, has met with terrorists like Hamas terrorist Khaled Meshaal, and meddled in the affairs of Israel, like he [Carter] was some sort of statesman. The useful idiot who could not get 52 Americans released is about as useful a mediator as a toddler trying to drive a semi-truck. Obambi would negotiate with our worse enemies UNCONDITIONALLY just like Carter continues to have intercourse with Saudi Arabia, whose wahhabism calls Jews “pigs” and America the Great Satan, Iran whose head nutjob just called Israel a “stinking corpse,” and this idiot has PRAISED such leaders as Castro, Mugabe, Chavez, Daniel Ortega, and even once said that Ceausescu and Tito were in the forefront of human rights! Indeed, one would believe that Carter and Castro have had a love affair going back several decades as often as Jimmy the Dhimmi as kissed Castro’s butt. Jimmy the Dhimmi castigates our allies, just like Obambi did to Pakistan, much to the chagrin of American prestige. The bottom line is that Jimmy the Dhimmi should keep himself confined to building shoddy homes in the Habitat for Humanity (below link) but even that, like his presidency, sucks. Maybe if he just STFU and took Saudi money to legitmize their wahhabi state would be enough if he refrained from meddling in foreign policy. His meddling, BTW, is in violation of US Code, why has he not been charged?

Once a HARDCHARGING Democrat by the Ed Koch called Jimmy the Dhimmi a, “miserable president,” and he was dead-on. Like his predecessor Jimmy the Dhimmi, Obambi would just be a continuation of the failed Carter years. The same old, same old, coming out of the mouth of a political opportunist. Modern Liberalism will lurch further to the Left, if that is possible, if either Obambi or Hitlery take the helm and perform buffonery like Carter putting flowers on Arafat’s grave when it was the PLO, led by Arafat, who MURDERED U.S. Diplomats in Khartoum in 1973 and again in 2003! The Dhimmicrats have control of the unions and the inner-city voters who are TOLD whom to vote for (DC itself is 50% illiterate) but in the old adage from the Gunny’s biker days, “paint and chrome don’t get you home,” liberals continue to spray gold paint on a turd and call it their platform. A platform that will eventually collapse. A Socialist empty-suiter with a rock-star following and a power-mad and angry radical Socialist feminazi will only get you so far down the road before the machine breaks down. With either of these two leftist lightweights in charge (and McShamnesty is not much better), we may live to see the diseased carcass of liberalism finally dead and buried, as it should have been after 1968.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/17/us/17habitat.html?pagewanted=print
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (17) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive