In part two, we're going to delve deeper into the immmature and childlike nature of the liberal/socialists.

   The immature liberal selling this bogus ideology are deeply possessed or motivated by an underlying core of fury, envy, self-absorption, childlike irresponsibility, vengeance on those who have “tax the rich!”, resentment, and delusion that they were denied by the  promises of the system which should have delivered the American Dream to them without a hitch. The corruption of liberalism is the joy of the “soft-squeezy” generation since it can be scammed over and over again without fail. Have a shortfall from “skimming” a tad too much, just raise taxes on the masses, and do it as much as one wants. Indeed, when The Gunny has pointed out to liberals that socialism and/or communism has never worked in any country it has been tried in, ever. The liberal children’s reply was that those nations were not true socialism or communism nations or systems. THEY made mistakes but WE won’t. They infuse a generous suspension of disbelief into the mix and it’s off to the races. Socialism is nothing more than empty promises sloganed out as a sales pitch to the masses as evident in Zimbabwe. The “less is more” as the people starve and the land goes fallow. Finally, once the socialist gains power and the slogans lose their flavor, the masses are stuck with the “I want it now” lib child and the immature monster that was there from the beginning, hidden behind the mask, jumps out.

   The “soft-squeezy” generation lives in a world totally detached from reality. They absolutely refuse to see things as they are but rather, see things as they want them to be. A dangerous delusion that is coming around full-circle to bite them in the butt. For example, they seek to make the US lose in Iraq, simply because they hate George Bush, clueless to the implication of an Iran/Iraq team run by Islamofascists. America has come a long way from the time when a person’s survival depended on how hard they worked, whether reaping in the field or turning out a well-made firearm that could be sold at market. Those that failed to apply themselves ended up enduring a bad winter, if they survived it at all. The children’s story of the Ant and the Grasshopper should be required reading for liberals and until they can understand the concept behind it, then the closest that they should get to a voting booth is driving by one. Once upon a time in America, taking  something from a neighbor (without permission), that said neighbor had raised for his or his family’s survival, was considered to be a crime. People were jailed or shot for stealing back then. At the very least, it caused a moral outrage in the community, that came back a hundredfold on the perpetrator but now those perpetrators are in the Congress or in the White House.

   The “soft-squeezy” generation is also deeply out of touch when it comes to the subject of choices, of which we make hundreds if not thousands a day. Choices like: beliefs, values, to spend or not to spend my entire paycheck, life styles, behavior, smoking, etc., is ultimately one of eventual consequences. The liberal does not want to be confronted with such difficult tasks as well as the adult part of taking the responsibility to accept the consequences of said choices. Just take one glance at the spoiled liberal children in Hollywood. A DUI, a drug bust, a hit and run in conjunction with a DUI, and it’s, “I’m on drugs and going into rehab, it’s not my fault.” The liberal  wants to have the latitude to make a crappy choice, usually illegal, and then when it backfires or they get caught, they want to mitigate those consequences on everyone else. “It’s YOUR FAULT that I…” Do they sound like the juvenile children they are or what?

   The main focus of effort for the liberal has become one of forcing the other members of society to support their irrational and self-indulgent life styles, values, and/or beliefs. Don’t like homosexuals? Better shut up lest you be dubbed a “homophobe” and charged with hate speech! Isn’t that something by the way, hate speech? How long before the liberals begin to ratchet down on what IS and what ISN’T acceptable speech. Hate speech laws are a nice end run around the First Amendment and a nice way to shelter the “protected” classes in our society. And here all along, The Gunny thought there was only one class in American society, Americans. Liberals have enacted the doctrine of cultural pluralism, that is, the lifestyles and the demands for support from these “protected” classes have become viewed as one-way political rights. If 90% of America doesn’t want to legalize gay marriage the liberal activist judges state: "we are going to do what we want to do whether Americans like it or not. We will declare what is right and what isn’t and Marx help you if you deviate from the party line.” Joe Liebermann strayed and found out where the bear sh*ts in the woods. The liberal declares that if we have to, we’ll restructure society in order to get our way."